John Singleton with Bob Howard, Rip Van Australia (Stanmore: Cassell Australia, 1977), pp. 83-87, under the heading “Education”.
Education is the modern cure-all. It is thought of as the barrier that has to be smashed through before poor or underprivileged kids can make good. Because of this too much emphasis is placed on qualifications and education in our society today. We are so concerned with force feeding education to our kids that we’ve forgotten something. We’ve forgotten that our children aren’t mindless robots, but real, living, flesh-and-blood human beings. They have minds, needs, and wills of their own. But we, in our wisdom, have managed to construct an education system that mounts a brutal attack on all three. We then have the hide to turn around and resent the fact that our children don’t don’t appear to appreciate what it is we are doing for them. It’s probably because they are so painfully aware of what we are doing to them, that children are a little confused about what it is we are supposed to be doing for them.
That our educational system is not producing the goods is by now common knowledge. Business people are increasingly concerned about the lack of skills — such as the abilities to read, write and effectively communicate — demonstrated by many schools and university graduates. The dissatisfaction of large numbers of young people with the education system is also obvious. How many would attend if they didn’t have to? Schools are being burnt down and vandalized. (The same does not happen to libraries, which are voluntary places of learning.)
Educationalist John Holt has for many years been a trenchant critic of modern educationist systems:
When you turn education into a race, which is essentially what we do, you have to have more losers than winners. That’s how races work. We really have to award 100 loser labels in our schools for every winner label we put on. The trouble with putting loser labels on people is that they begin to feel like losers, and think like losers, and act like losers, and human growth stops.1
Modern education has led to a complete breakdown of the old educational networks that used to exist in culture and communities. The standard response to children’s questions to parents is likely to be “ask your teachers”.
In Australia, as elsewhere, [so-called] mental illness is becoming enormously more prevalent. There is an epidemic of unhappiness, of people not knowing what they want to do, what occupation they want. Eventually, they drift into some job or other, but because of a basic lack of interest, don’t do it well. All this and more is happening. We see it, have experienced it, know it, and naturally do nothing about it.
Learning is the most natural function known to us. We start learning the moment we are born (if not before). We have to learn to survive.
Young children are the most inquisitive beings imaginable. “Why?” is the most constant word tossed at parents. Babies learn with all their senses — touching, tasting, listening, seeing, feeling emotionally (as distinct from touching), and talking (or attempting to).
Why is it that after a few years in school, this all changes, and children have to be forced to “learn”? Is this inherent in children, or is it the educational system that is at fault? Why does it take a Japanese baby only eighteen months to learn the Japanese language and an excellent student in Australia at least four times that long to learn next to nothing about the same language from “experts”?
The fault lies in the system. Our present educational system performs three functions (or is supposed to). They are: (1) growth and learning; (2) a jail function; (3) a sorting and grading function (keeping the children off the streets and out of their parent’s way). The reason this sort of system gets into trouble is that (1) is incompatible with (2) and (3). The jailed children merely learn the game.
The following lengthy but important quote from Thomas Johnson, illustrates this perfectly:
Any system which is based on force must have the implements necessary to apply this force to keep the victims subdued. In the educational system these implements are the grades and degrees.
The grade is the scholastic gun which is placed in the hands of the instructor, thus giving him full control over his charges. Having this powerful weapon, the instructor can demand that the students follow his every command, for the students know if they choose to do otherwise, if they should choose not to waste their time with nonsensical busy work, if they choose to challenge a pronouncement of the teacher, if they should desire to write a composition in a manner to their own liking, that is, if they should decide to express their individuality through independent thought and action, they can be shot down.
Students also realise that if they do not go along with the system, if they do not completely submit their wills to others, that they will be denied that certificate of graduation, which in present day society is most essential in obtaining a desired position.
Thus, we can see today millions of youths being forced into, or “voluntarily” entering, scholastic prisons which we euphemistically call schools, where they are exposed to a constant environment of force and fear, where they quickly learn that hypocrisy is the name of the game, that what really counts is not what one knows or wishes to know but how to figure out and please the master of the class. Where they readily come to realise that every other student is a natural enemy who may jeopardise a student’s academic standing and that the student who gains the greatest success in the system is the one who is the most subservient, the one who becomes the docile follower of rules, who jumps at every command and sacrifices his will to that of instructors and administrators.
As John Holt (in The Underachieving School) has unmistakably clarified: “School is a long lesson in How to Turn Yourself Off.” He correctly asserts that in the schools “What children learn is Practical Slavery”:
Drawn on top of a student’s desk, which is, in reality, the prison cell of the captive inmate of the education institution, was the sketch of a tombstone on the face of which a student had written “In memory of all those who have died waiting for the bell”. This anguished expression of despair, silently drawn, during one of the long and seemingly never-ending periods of boredom that all students are subjected to, vividly reveals the nature of the educational system, a system which suffocates, numbs, and in some instances, brings about the death of the mind. It is these innumerable periods of torturous boredom that turns students into somnambulant robots ready to be led by any assertive individual who grabs a position of power.
The silent majority that if often referred to does exist, and it is silent because it consists of humans who have been dehumanised, whose minds have either been turned down (in which case the individuals choose to restrict their thinking to a few areas — their work, hobbies or other areas of special interest) or turned off and who quietly recede into their own frightened corner of our world — and almost beg for some authority to tell them what they can and cannot do. It is only natural that individuals who were subjected to twelve to sixteen years of a completely controlled, dictatorial environment, as they were in school (as students, they were most assuredly the silenced majority), would continue to remain silent as adults.
The only reason that the entire world today is not a complete dictatorship is the saving fact that students are only in school five or six hours a day, and thus in their free time (when they are released from the scholastic cages) a number of them are capable of developing some degree of independence and self-esteem, which means, some degree of mental maturity. And it is these few individuals that are responsible for maintaining those vestiges of freedom that remain in the world …
… a classroom is one of the most immoral, the most inhuman, environment in existence, for it ignores the chosen, the understood, and the rational, and simply demands the compliance of the students to the master and his commandments. The proceedings of a dogmatic classroom are mystic rituals devoted to the slaughter of man’s mind.2
Our modern schools kill imagination, kill initiative, kill the ability to make decisions and judgements, and most of all kill the desire to learn and the love of learning. We should not be surprised to find this. If the government makes a mess of running the postal services, the railways, the buses, welfare systems and the economy, it is very unlikely that it would do any better with education.
The reasons for this failure are fundamentally the same as for government failures in other areas. Government has made effective, open competition impossible, has prevented the market from operating, and has substituted instead the use of coercion. Private schools are very difficult to open. There are numerous government requirements that they must satisfy for example, (idiocies like window area must be a “certain percentage” of floor area, toilet and playground facilities must be “adequate”, and so on). Taxation and inflation make the accumulation of capital difficult. And schools are not immune from economic factors such as rates, land and building costs, material costs, wage costs, maintenance costs, book costs, and all the other economic aspects of life. All of these have effectively prevented the opening of an enormous number of alternative private schools, and have thus discouraged diversity, experimentation, innovation and development.
The government has effectively created for itself a coercive monopoly on education, which it holds onto in complete defiance of market demands. The elimination of all restrictions on the opening and operating of private educational alternatives is a must. It would at least give us some outs, and some real choice.
By far the greatest lesson we have to learn though, is the fundamental truth of the old saying, “You can lead a child to school, but you can’t make him learn.” All today’s education system has done is to make children hate learning and knowledge, and to justifiably lose respect for their parents and social institutions. If you owned a store, and the government guaranteed that a certain number of people would, every day, spend a certain amount of money in your store, what would happen? (Assuming that the amount you would receive was enough to satisfy you.) What would happen to your store, your service and your attitude? Nothing is what.
And that is the situation in our schools. The teachers are guaranteed classes. The schools are guaranteed customers by the zoning regulations and compulsory attendance laws. As a result, there is no market function relating what is offered by way of facilities, teachers and syllabuses to the demands of the market. We are forced to accept what we get. This is why compulsory schooling has to go.
Without compulsory education, bad teachers would be left without classes, bad schools without pupils. In order to attract good teachers and pupils, schools would at long last have to look at their product. They would have to develop relevant syllabuses, the most attractive teaching methods, and supply good facilities. Because the compulsion was no longer there, the disruptive students would leave school and the students that were there would be there because they wanted to be there. The psychological benefits alone to the students (and teachers) would be enormous.
Of course, it will be argued that there are parents who don’t care about their children. We agree, but question whether or not the wholesale slaughter going on in our schools today can be justified on the grounds that it provides an education of dubious value to a few who otherwise might not get one. There are plenty of concerned people and organisations about, who would attempt to help such neglected children. Let’s not compound the problem by ruining the rest of the children as well.
Our governments will spend over $4,000 million this year on education. It’s time we asked what we are getting for it. Let’s start treating our children as having the same rights as other people. There is a market need for education. Modern industry cannot survive without a constant supply of engineers, scientists, accountants, solicitors, etc. There is every incentive for industry to support schools. A privately owned and operated free market educational system would supply whatever type and quality of education there was a need for. That’s how the open, competitive market works.
Companies would inevitably supply scholarships, loans, apprenticeships and cadetships that would allow even the poorest person a chance. It is also highly probable that some companies would own and operate their own schools, especially for the children of their employees. Learning should be an enjoyable process. It can be if we build the system to suit people instead of the other way round.
- Governments Consume Wealth — They Don't Create It
- Singo and Howard Propose Privatising Bondi Beach
- Singo and Howard Speak Out Against the Crackpot Realism of the CIS and IPA
- Singo and Howard on Compromise
- Singo and Howard on Monopolies
- Singo and Howard Support Sydney Harbour Bridge Restructure
- Singo and Howard on Striking at the Root, and the Failure of Howard, the CIS and the IPA
- Singo and Howard Explain Why Australia is Not a Capitalist Country
- Singo and Howard Call Democracy Tyrannical
- Singo and Howard on Drugs!
- Simpleton sells his poll philosophy
- Singo and Howard Decry Australia Day
- Singo and Howard Endorse the Workers Party
- Singo and Howard Oppose the Liberal Party
- Singo and Howard Admit that Liberals Advocate and Commit Crime
- Up the Workers! Bob Howard's 1979 Workers Party Reflection in Playboy
- John Whiting's Inaugural Workers Party Presidential Address
- John Singleton and Bob Howard 1975 Monday Conference TV Interview on the Workers Party
- Singo and Howard on Aborigines
- Singo and Howard on Conservatism
- Singo and Howard on the Labor Party
- Singo, Howard and Hancock Want to Secede
- John Singleton changes his name
- Lang Hancock's Foreword to Rip Van Australia
- New party will not tolerate bludgers: Radical party against welfare state
- Singo and Howard introduce Rip Van Australia
- Singo and Howard on Knee-Jerks
- Singo and Howard on Tax Hunts (Lobbying)
- Singo and Howard on Rights
- Singo and Howard on Crime
- Singo and Howard on Justice
- Singo and Howard on Unemployment
- John Singleton on 1972's Cigarette Legislation
- Singo and Howard: Gambling Should Neither Be Illegal Nor Taxed
- Workers Party Platform
- Singo and Howard Join Forces to Dismantle Welfare State
- Singo and Howard on Business
- Singo and Howard on Discrimination
- Singo and Howard on the Greens
- Singo and Howard on Xenophobia
- Singo and Howard on Murdoch, Packer and Monopolistic Media
- Singo and Howard Explain that Pure Capitalism Solves Pollution
- Singo and Howard Defend Miners Against Government
- Singo and Howard on Bureaucracy
- Singo and Howard on Corporate Capitalism
- The last words of Charles Russell
- Ted Noffs' Preface to Rip Van Australia
- Right-wing anarchists revamping libertarian ideology
- Giving a chukka to the Workers Party
- Govt "villain" in eyes of new party
- "A beautiful time to be starting a new party": Rand fans believe in every man for himself
- Introducing the new Workers' Party
- Paul Rackemann 1980 Progress Party Election Speech
- Lang Hancock 1978 George Negus Interview
- Voices of frustration
- Policies of Workers Party
- Party Promises to Abolish Tax
- AAA Tow Truck Co.
- Singo and Howard on Context
- Singo and Howard Blame Roosevelt for Pearl Harbour
- Singo and Howard on Apathy
- Workers Party is "not just a funny flash in the pan"
- Singo and Howard on Decency
- John Singleton in 1971 on the 2010 Federal Election
- Matthew, Mark, Luke & John Pty. Ltd. Advertising Agents
- Viv Forbes Wins 1986 Adam Smith Award
- The writing of the Workers Party platform and the differences between the 1975 Australian and American libertarian movements
- Who's Who in the Workers Party
- Bob Howard interviewed by Merilyn Giesekam on the Workers Party
- A Farewell to Armchair Critics
- Sukrit Sabhlok interviews Mark Tier
- David Russell Leads 1975 Workers Party Queensland Senate Team
- David Russell Workers Party Policy Speech on Brisbane TV
- Bludgers need not apply
- New party formed "to slash controls"
- The Workers Party
- Malcolm Turnbull says "the Workers party is a force to be reckoned with"
- The great consumer protection trick
- The "Workers" speak out
- How the whores pretend to be nuns
- The Workers Party is a Political Party
- Shit State Subsidised Socialist Schooling Should Cease Says Singo
- My Journey to Anarchy:
From political and economic agnostic to anarchocapitalist
- Workers Party Reunion Intro
- Singo and Howard on Freedom from Government and Other Criminals
- Singo and Howard on Young People
- Singo and Howard Expose how Government Healthcare Controls Legislate Doctors into Slavery
- Singo and Howard Engage with Homosexuality
- Singo and Howard Demand Repeal of Libel and Slander Laws
- Singo and Howard on Consumer Protection
- Singo and Howard on Consistency
- Workers Party is born as foe of government
- Political branch formed
- Government seen by new party as evil
- Singo and Howard on Non-Interference
- Singo and Howard on Women's Lib
- Singo and Howard on Licences
- Singo and Howard on Gun Control
- Singo and Howard on Human Nature
- Singo and Howard on Voting
- Singo and Howard on
- Singo and Howard on Education
- Singo and Howard on Qualifications
- Ron Manners on the Workers Party
- Singo and Howard Hate Politicians
- Undeserved handouts make Australia the lucky country
- A happy story about Aborigines
- John Singleton on Political Advertising
- Richard Hall, Mike Stanton and Judith James on the Workers Party
- Singo Incites Civil Disobedience
- How John Singleton Would Make Tony Abbott Prime Minister
- The Discipline of Necessity
- John Singleton on the first election the Workers Party contested
- Libertarians: Radicals on the right
- The Bulletin on Maxwell Newton as Workers Party national spokesman on economics and politics
- Singo and Howard: Australia Should Pull Out of the Olympics
- Singo and Howard Like Foreign Investment
- Mark Tier corrects Nation Review on the Workers Party
- The impossible dream
- Why can't I get away with it?
- The bold and boring Lib/Lab shuffle
- Time for progress
- The loonie right implodes
- Max Newton: Maverick in Exile
- John Singleton on refusing to do business with criminals and economic illiterates
- Censorship should be banned
- "Listen, mate, a socialist is a bum"
- John Singleton on Advertising
- John Singleton on why he did the Hawke re-election campaign
- Sinclair Hill calls for dropping a neutron bomb on Canberra
- Bob Howard in Reason 1974-77
- John Singleton defends ockerism
- Singo and Howard talk Civil Disobedience
- The Census Con
- Singo and Howard Oppose Australian Participation in the Vietnam War
- Did John Singleton oppose the mining industry and privatising healthcare in 1990?
- Bob Carr in 1981 on John Singleton's political bent
- John Singleton-Ita Buttrose interview (1977)
- King Leonard of Hutt River Declares Defensive Just War Against Australia the Aggressor
- Singo says Lang Hancock violated Australia's 11th commandment: Thou Shalt Not Succeed
- Singleton: the White Knight of Ockerdom
- John Singleton bites into Sinclair Hill's beef
- Save Parramatta Road
- 1979 news item on new TV show John Singleton With a Lot of Help From His Friends
- Smoking, Health and Freedom
- Singo and Howard on Unions
- Singo and Howard Smash the State
- Singo and Howard on the big issue of Daylight Saving
- Come back Bob - It was all in fun!
- A few "chukkas" in the Senate for polo ace?
- Country Rejuvenation - Towards a Better Future
- Singo and Howard on Profits, Super Profits and Natural Disasters
- John Singleton's 1977 pitch that he be on a committee of one to run the Sydney 1988 Olympics for profit
- Thoughts on Land Ownership
- 1975 Max Newton-Ash Long interview on the Workers Party
- The Electoral Act should allow voters to choose "none of the above"
- The great Labor Party platform: first or last, everybody wins a prize
- The politics of marketing - laugh now, pay later
- Singo and Howard call Australia fascist and worse
- The mouse will roar
- Viv Forbes and Jim Fryar vs Malcolm Fraser in 1979
- Quip, Quote, Rant and Rave: four of Viv Forbes' letters to the editor in The Australian in 1979
- Australia's First Official Political Party Poet Laureate: The Progress Party's Ken Hood in 1979
- Harry M. Miller and The Australian disgrace themselves
- Ocker ad genius takes punt on art
- John Singleton 1976 ocker Monday Conference Max Harris debate
- John Singleton mocks university students on civil liberties and freedom of choice in 1971
- Murray Rothbard championed on Australian television in 1974 (pre-Workers Party!) by Maureen Nathan
- John Singleton profile in 1977 Australian MEN Vogue
- I think that I shall never see a telegraph pole as lovely as a tree
- Ralph Nader vs John Singleton on Consumer Protection
- John Singleton's first two "Think" columns in Newspaper News, 1969
- Singo and Howard on Ballet
- Product innovation comes first
- Protect who from a 'mindless' wife?
- A party is born
- Tiny Workers' Party gives us a hint
- John Singleton on the ad industry, consumerism and innovation
- Workers Party Economic Policy Statement, December 1975
- Lang Hancock on the Workers Party, secession and States Rights
- John Singleton and Howard on Government Largesse
- Counterculture must exclude government handouts
- John Singleton's 1974 Federal Liberal Election Campaign Ads
- John Singleton believes in the Workers Party
- Write-up of John Singleton's 1978 speech to the Australian Liberal Students Association
- Singo in 1987: "Joh doesn't go far enough ... I want absolute deregulation of the economy"
- Maxwell Newton chapter of Clyde Packer's No Return Ticket (1984)
- Singo and Howard on Totalitarian Socialism and Voluntary Socialism
- Rip Van Australia on Ripoff Vandals Taxing Australia
- Singo and Howard beg for tolerance
- John Singleton's 1985 advertising comeback
- Singo and Howard Demand End to Public Transport
- John Singleton and Howard on Fred Nile, Festival of Light, FamilyVoice Australia and the Christian Lobby
- Capitalism: Survival of the Fittest
- Return Australia Post to Sender
- Singo and Howard on Public Utilities
- John Singleton and Howard say monarchy should be funded by monarchists alone
- Government Schools Teach Fascism Perfectly
- CIS and IPA Defend State Schooling
- Quadrant Defends State Schooling
- Singo and Howard on Striking at the Root, and the Failure of Howard, the CIS and the IPA
- Teaching My Kids to Read and Write
- Our kids don't deserve such nonsense
- Shit State Subsidised Socialist Schooling Should Cease Says Singo
- Greg Lindsay: state schooling unjust
- Singo and Howard on Education
- Paddy McGuinness in 1994 on the 2012 class size debate
- State aid and the privileged
- The lies they teach our children: Vipers in the nation's classrooms