A Modest Farmer [Bert Kelly], “Politicians’ statements worthy only of contempt,” The Australian Financial Review, August 29, 1980, p. 13. Reprinted in Economics Made Easy (Adelaide: Brolga Books, 1982), pp. 223-25, as “After the Cabinet Decision (a).”
Do you remember the words of the naughty lady in the musical comedy Oklahoma who sang:
It ain’t so much a question of not knowing what to do:
I’ve known what’s right and wrong since I’ve been ten.
I know I mustn’t fall into the pit
But when I’m with a fella, I forgit!
Most people have known what was the right and wrong thing to do about the high tariffs protecting the textile, clothing and footwear (T.C.E.) industries. If we don’t, it is not because we have not been told often enough and by the good and great too. With ringing eloquence they have told us that we must lower trade barriers, particularly those that shelter the T.C.F. group. Let us listen to our masters’ voices.
First, let us hear from our Prime Minister who leads the Liberal Party which often proudly proclaims its belief in free enterprise and how people and industries should not always be leaning on the government. When Mr Fraser was in Lusaka, winning his international accolade, he demonstrated that he knew how we ought to handle this problem of trade barriers. I quote from his speech:
Defensive protectionist policies exacerbate the situation they are meant to deal with … We need policies which will free resources of capital and labour and allow them to reflect the operation of market forces including, most importantly, the competitive forces of international trade.
Having read that firm and statesmanlike utterance, we expected that he would be in favour of a reduction in the protection for the T.C.F. industries. But he was in the vanguard when the decision was made to keep the T.C.F. tariffs high.
Next, let us listen to Mr Anthony, the Leader of the Country Party which poses as friend of the farmers. Mr Anthony knows that farmers who are exporters have to carry their share (about 40%) of protecting the T.C.F. group and this is estimated to cost all the exporters about $750 million a year. That Mr Anthony knew the difference between right and wrong he clearly demonstrated in 1979 when he said:
If we are going to export more products which we can produce competitively, then we must also import more of the products we produce less competitively.
So those of us who foolishly believed what politicians told us thought that Mr Anthony would be in favour of reducing the burden of protecting the T.C.F. group. But he went to water with the rest.
Then we looked hopefully towards Mr Nixon who, as Minister for Primary Industry, could be expected to have a particular responsibility for the well being of farmers. He is also said to have a bit of guts. He too demonstrated that he knew right from wrong as this quotation from a speech of his shows:
We cannot afford to saddle our most efficient industries with the continuing burden of high cost uneconomic industries. The sooner we realise that, the sooner will we arrest inflation and declining rates of growth and employment.
When we heard that we thought we could depend on our Peter but he sold us down the drain with the others.
Some of looked hopefully towards Mr Tony Street, the Minister for Industrial Relations, who used to have a mind of his own. One of us unearthed a very sensible speech of his made in 1977 when he said:
Higher tariffs do not overcome the underlying problems of Australia’s poor competitive showing. In a very real sense they exacerbate the general problem because high tariffs tend to raise the price of the protected imports and of the local product afforded additional protection. Whatever the higher tariff may do for the individual industry concerned, it results in pushing up the general price level, and when wages are further adjusted for price rises, all industries find their costs rising.
When we read this, those of us who knew what a brave little beggar he used to be, thought we could depend on him to the bitter end. But he shot through on us also.
I think that I will be able to find some more similar quotations for next week’s essay. Mr Peacock has made some perfectly splendid statements and Mr Robinson too. But summing up so far I cannot help thinking that, as the value of money is destroyed by printing too much of it, so our belief in what our politicians tell us is destroyed by excessive incantation. We cannot be blamed for treating the statements of our statesmen with cynical contempt.
A Modest Farmer [Bert Kelly], “A many splendoured catalogue of meaningless statements,” The Australian Financial Review, September 5, 1980, p. 13. Reprinted in Economics Made Easy (Adelaide: Brolga Books, 1982), pp. 225-27, as “After the Cabinet Decision (b).”
Last week [above] I quoted speeches of the good and great which showed that they knew that trade barriers protecting the textile, clothing and footwear (T.C.F.) industries should be lowered as the I.A.C. recommended. But in spite of their loud and eloquent urgings, the government continued the present devastatingly high protection for these industries which is costing us exporters and consumers about $750 million a year. I ended by saying that next week I would examine statements made by Messrs Peacock and Robinson, two very powerful members of Cabinet, who have made some perfectly splendid speeches on the subject, only here again their practice does not square with their preaching. Then I was going to quote Mr Stone of Treasury, the Harries Report, and so on and on through all the impeccable authorities.
So, with Eccles’ help, I prepared a catalogue of splendid material and I read it with some excitement, and it made me feel really virtuous. But both Fred and Mavis advised me to tear it up. Fred’s argument was sour and simple:
There is no sense in proving that you cannot rely on what politicians say, Bert. That is news no longer. Everyone knows that the sods will say anything, particularly in election year. Why bore people by telling us what we already know only too well?
Mavis took a shrewder line:
It’s no good going on about these things, dear. Politicians sometimes have to do things that they know are wrong. You would have been in Parliament now if you had learnt that simple lesson instead of listening to that wretched Eccles. Probably the government thought they had to do what they knew was wrong in order to prevent more unemployment.
I know the government justified its action of leaving the trade barriers high by claiming that it was concerned about the 30,000 jobs that the I.A.C. estimated would be lost over a period of five years if its recommendations had been followed. But 20,000 of these jobs will disappear anyway because of the increased use of labour saving machinery which is an inevitable result of striving for increasing productivity.
But perhaps the government does not want this to happen and would prefer the industries to stick to hand looms instead. This is what the P.M. had in mind when he said:
Because of rising labour costs, employers are tending to use machines rather than people in the production process. If tariff protection for Australian industry were reduced, this trend would worsen. The government has worked to ensure that the push for lower tariffs would not continue.
The P.M. is a Luddite at heart and clearly sees the solution to our unemployment problem is not replacing men with machines. Yet at the same time the government encourages the installation of new labour saving machines by giving factories accelerated depreciation on new machines. You can’t blame us for getting confused!
However, let us return to the employment argument. Unless the P.M. has his way and succeeds in sitting on the productivity horse’s head, the ordinary economic pressures for increased productivity that work on all other industries, including farming, will also operate on the T.C.F. group, so 20,000 of the 30,000 people will have disappeared anyway after five years. But that would still leave 10,000 jobs that the I.A.C. estimate would be lost in five years if its recommendations had been adopted. Should we not be concerned at the loss of 2,000 jobs a year?
Well, we have been losing farmers at a much faster rate than that and no one seems to be worried. The average yearly loss of the farmer workforce has averaged 5,460 for the last 25 years. It seems proper for farmers to obey the economic laws, and small grocery stores also, but it appears there has to be a special place in heaven for the T.C.F. group. What have they got besides a strident voice, that we haven’t got?
Employment in the T.C.F. industries has been falling for years, in spite of their receiving an annual subsidy of about $750 million. More people are making their own clothes because clothes are so expensive, others are making do with less clothes for the same reason. Others are going overseas to buy clothes where they are so much cheaper. The government seems to have forgotten that the traditional way of dampening the demand for a product is to increase its price. It has certainly succeeded in doing this, if nothing else. Yet it continually maintains that its first aim is to reduce inflation. Holding the price of clothes artificially high seems a queer way of doing this.
- Bert Kelly on his journalism
- Move for a body of Modest Members
- Modest Members Association
- Bert Kelly's Maiden Parliamentary Speech
- Government Intervention
- 1976 Monday Conference transcript featuring Bert Kelly
- Bert Kelly, Hayek and Mencken on the virtues of farmers
- Sound economics calls for quiet from government
- Petrol for Farmers
- Some Sacred Cows
- Experiences in Parliament
- Spending your Money
- Is Taxmania a politician fetish?
- How Bert Kelly repays a free feed
- Modest column #898
- Chicken-hearted feathered friends strange bedfellows on a feather bed?
- Who needs literary licence?
- A touch of Fred's anarchy
- Helping the farmers help themselves
- Standing on the shoulders of the downtrodden
- Supply and Demand
- Bert Kelly responds to claims he is arrogant and uncredentialed
- Politics: it's a very confusing business
- The best featherbeds run on rails
- Bert Kelly on Disaster Relief
- Bert Kelly Wants to Secede
- Blinded by their tears
- Anti-freedom pro-tobacco industry lobby harmed Australia
- Under Labor, is working hard foolish?
- An Idiot's Guide to Interventionism
- Is free healthcare worthless?
- Can government kiss it better?
- Bert Kelly Destroys the Side Benefits Argument for Government
- Bert Kelly gets his head around big-headed bird-brained politics
- First Modest Member (Bert Kelly) AFR Column
- Second Modest Member (Bert Kelly) AFR Column
- Third Modest Member (Bert Kelly) AFR Column
- Fourth Modest Member (Bert Kelly) AFR Column
- Fifth Modest Member (Bert Kelly) AFR Column
- Sixth Modest Member (Bert Kelly) AFR Column
- Bert Kelly on the 2011 Budget and Australia's Pathetic Journalists and Politicians
- Bert Kelly, Bastard or Simple Sod?
- Liberal Backbencher Hits Govt. Over Import Restrictions
- Bert Kelly feels a dam coming on at each election
- Bert Kelly Enters Parliament
- Why take in one another's washing?
- Bert Kelly breaks the law, disrespects government and enjoys it
- Gillard's galley-powered waterskiing
- State Premiers are always asking for more taxing powers
- Can price control really work?
- Should we put up with socialism?
- We're quick to get sick of socialism
- Time the protection racket ended
- Can't pull the wool over Farmer Fred
- People not Politics
- Bert Kelly admits he should have had less faith in politicians
- The inspirational incentivising Dear Leader Gough Whitlam
- Labor: a girl who couldn't say no
- Why leading businessmen carry black briefcases
- Ludwig von Mises on page 3 of AFR
- Bert Kelly's empowering feminism
- Mavis wants the Modest Member to dedicate his book to her
- What if the whole country is swindled?
- Moss Cass: "Flood plains are for floods"
- A worm's eye view
- Eccles returns to haunt us
- How to grip a politician's ear
- It's hard to digest this economic cake
- Time to Butcher "Aussie Beef"
- Cold water on government-instigated irrigation schemes
- Hooray for Ord River Dam!
- Tariffs paid by exporters
- The problem of principles v popularity
- If you support State Quotas, where will your logic take you?
- Against guidance by government
- A socialist in Liberal clothing
- Never ask the government to help
- Don't listen to economists!
- Bert Kelly's revolutionary strategy
- Whitlam's July 1973 25% tariff cut
- Bert Kelly on Import Quotas
- Good directions when government backseat driving, like reversing down wrong side of road
- Barriers to imports are barriers to exports
- Bert Kelly reviews The War Diaries of Weary Dunlop
- Bert Kelly reviews We Were There
- Tariffs get the fork-tongue treatment
- Bert Kelly reduces government to its absurdities
- Politician sacrifices his ... honesty
- It's all a matter of principle
- Bert Kelly Destroys the Infant Industry Argument
- Bert Kelly Untangles Tariff Torment
- Bert Kelly resorts to prayer
- Eccles keeps our nose hard down on the tariff grindstone
- "Don't you believe in protecting us against imports from cheap labour countries?"
- Even if lucky, we needn't be stupid
- Great "freedom of choice" mystery
- Small government's growth problem
- I like my kind acts to get a mention in the press
- A Modest Member rakes the embers
- Tariffs Introduced
- More About Tariffs
- Sacred cow kicker into print
- Bert Kelly's 1984 two-article quote-collection on Aboriginal policies
- Modest Member must not give up
- Traditional Wheat Farming is Our Birthright and Heritage and Must be Protected!
- Tariff-cut nonsense lives on
- Bert Kelly brilliantly defends "theoretical academics"
- The high cost of protection
- Generosity creates problems
- The Society of Modest Members
- John Hyde's illogical, soft, complicated, unfocussed and unsuccessful attempt to communicate why he defends markets
- Modesty ablaze
- Case for ministers staying home
- The unusual self-evident simplicity of the Modest Members Society
- Animal lib the new scourge of the bush
- The Association for the Prevention of Cruelty to Krill
- modest members society
- Repeal economic laws, force people to buy new cars and enforce tariffs against overseas tennis players
- Thoughts on how to kill dinosaurs
- Let's try the chill winds
- Taking the Right's road
- Bert Kelly: "I did not try often or hard enough"
- Bert Kelly "lacked ... guts and wisdom"
- A look at life without tariffs
- The Gospel according to Bert
- Tiny note on Bert Kelly's column in The Bulletin in 1985
- Why costs can't be guaranteed
- Hitting out with a halo
- Paying farmers not to grow crops will save on subsidies, revenge tariffs, etc
- "The Modest Farmer joins us" | "How The Modest Farmer came to be"
- Bert Kelly Destroys the Freeloading Justifies Government Argument
- Industrial Relations Club shovellers
- From Shann to Stone
- Government Intervention
- A sojourn in the real world
- The tariff wind swings
- Bigger Cake = Bigger Slices
- Bert Kelly on the Political Process
- A charabanc called protection
- Taken for a ride - to nowhere
- Down hill, in circles, all the way
- Economic facts and figures are statistics who should speak out
- Any cons arguing small business bad but big government good?
- Relationships with the Liberal Party
- Tariffs = High Prices + World War
- Bert Kelly's Family History
- Bert Kelly's Pre-Parliament Life
- What the MP could say to the Bishop
- Why Bert Kelly was not even more publicly outspoken
- WEATHER IS USUALLY UNUSUAL
- How to stand aside when it's time to be counted
- How the Modest Member went back to being a Modest Farmer
- My pearls of wisdom were dull beyond belief
- Bert Kelly on Political Football
- Undigested morsels in Fraser spew
- Bert Kelly on LSD
- Bert Kelly reflects on the Australian car industry in 1992
- Bert Kelly wants reprinted Shann's Economic History of Australia
- If tariffs are opposed here then why not there?
- The emperor has no textiles, clothing and footwear sense
- Ross Gittins Wins Bert Kelly Award
- Interesting 1964 Bert Kelly speech: he says he is not a free trader and that he supports protection!
- This is the wall the Right built
- Tariff Protection in Australia (1970)
- Has Santa socked it to car makers?
- Is the Budget a cargo cult?
- Will we end up subsidising one another?
- Keeping the bucket of worms alive
- Can we get off the stomach-churning head-spinning tariff merry-go-round?
- Do we want our money to fly?
- Can a bear be sure of a feed?
- How to impress your MP -
- The time for being nice to our MPs has gone ...
- Don't feel sorry for him -
hang on to his ear
- Trade wars can easily end up on a battlefield
- Tariffs Create Unemployment
- Bert Kelly recommends Ayn Rand
- Bert Kelly on Alf Rattigan's Industry Assistance: The Inside Story
- Bert Kelly's Satirical Prophecy: Minister for Meteorology (tick) and High Protectionist Policies to Result in War Yet Again (?)
- Bert Kelly in 1972 on Foreign Ownership of Australian Farmland and Warren Truss, Barnaby Joyce and Bill Heffernan in 2012
- Bert Kelly baits Welfare State Tiger
- Why does Govt wear two faces?
- Parliament a place for pragmatists
- Of Sugar Wells and Think-Tanks
- Bert Kelly: "I must take some of the blame"
- Bert Kelly on dumping duties
- The Govt's helping hand often hurts
- Unbuckling the hobbles on the motor industry
- A Modest Farmer looks at the Problems of Structural Change
- Government Fails Spectacularly
- Know your proper place if you want the quiet life
- Bert Kelly on political speech writers
- Having your cake and eating it
- Perish the thawed!
- Hooray for Northern Development!
- The silly image of our MPs
- Bert Kelly Question Time highlights
- Modest Farmer sees his ideas take hold
- Should facts stand in the way of a good story?
- Fondling one another's glass haloes
- What is the sense in making the effort to look after yourself?
- Fred's Feeling: Counterpatriotic country contrarian
- Handouts for big boys only
- Mavis trying to buy a hand loom
- Bad news for bearers of bad news
- Is it time to get aboard the tariff band-waggon?
- Why farmers resent tariff protection for motor makers
- A sordid use of scare tactics
- Goods vs services
- Tariffs are hilariously counterproductive
- Bert Kelly on decentralisation
- Inflation breeds moral decay
- Who envies equality?
- Growth – malignant or benign?
- Government wiser than Magna Carta
- Bert Kelly on looking to politicians for moral leadership
- Max Newton: Maverick in Exile
- Whitlam & co on the Dismissal
- 25% Tariff Cut
- Bert Kelly on pensions
- Mr Clunies-Ross of the Cocos Islands should rule Australia
- They get the wind up when it changes
- Why the Big Green Lie survives
- Ross McLean in 1982: "Malcolm! Why don't we try good government? It might be popular."
- Bert Kelly on the importance of exchange rate movements
- Bert Kelly shows how to attack
- Bert Kelly vs Bert Kelly vs Bert Kelly
- Industrial relations dinosaur, Bruce, chews his cud
- Hooray for "firmly entrenched"!
- Respect your dinosaurs
- What if something is "deeply ingrained" yet harmful?
- A case for ministerial inertia
- Why politicians don't like the truth
- Our great open spaces
- Ominous dark clouds are gathering
- Better to be popular than right
- Crying in the wilderness
- Ivory tower needs thumping
- Bert Kelly asks, "How can you believe in free enterprise and government intervention at the same time?"
- Politicians get undeserved praise, why not undeserved blame too?
- Feet in a bucket of champagne
- Rural Problems
- Health cover needs a $30 excess clause
- Unholy state of taxation
- Boring economics worth a smile
- The Libido for the Miserable
- Agricultural Development and Tariffs
- Fred's too poor to have principles
- Eccles Law of the constant wage share
- "He whom the gods would destroy ..."
- Tariffs: when to wean infant BHP?
- Keep any government as far as possible from farming
- The Playford charade is out of date
- Bert Kelly: the odd man out who's now in
- Dries must resist giving up struggle as going gets tough
- How a well meaning Government can be so stupid
- The icing on the economic cake
- Sir Roderick Carnegie's foreword to Bert Kelly's Economics Made Easy
- The Vale of Popularity and the Protection Procession
- Politics 101: Pay Lip Service to Capitalism and Shoot the Messenger
- Bert Kelly makes politicians eat their own words on tariffs, then says, "We cannot be blamed for treating the statements of our statesmen with cynical contempt"
- Bert Kelly on Free Enterprise
- Cartoons of protected industry, the welfare teat and the nanny state
- Bert Kelly on the theory of constant shares and the Fabian Society
- Bert Kelly vs Doug Anthony
- You're lucky if you escape being helped by government
- Bert Kelly on Small Farmers
- Bert Kelly on Apathy
- Bert Kelly in 1967 on "problems of government and things like that"
- The last "Dave's Diary"
- Bert Kelly vs The Australian on tariffs in 1977
- Bounties or Tariffs, Someone Pays
- Geriatric companies without a minder
- A free marketeer wary of free trade
- Nixon's puzzling profession of faith
- "Ford ... seems to spend more time bending its knees than its back"
- Clyde Cameron's weak ways with wise words
- Why flaunt what others flout?
- Bert Kelly yearns for Tim Flannery's powers of prediction
- Looking after yourself is silly
- Bert Kelly masterpiece on drought, fire, flood and other natural disaster relief schemes
- Government can take credit for our car industry mess
- Car makers want the 4wd driven deeper into tariff bog
- Why our MP is no longer prone to a good sob story
- Auto industry is in a straitjacket
- Bert Kelly on market predictions
- Why should dryland farmers subsidise irrigation farmers?
- How much should government decrease incentive for independence from government?
- Clarkson crowned Deputy Government Whip
- Bert Kelly to blame for soaring government healthcare costs
- 1959 return of Dave's Diary
- Bert Kelly in 1966 on developing northern Australia
- Successful government intervention can [sic] occur
- Vernon Report upholds Clarkson
- Quiet Man Makes An Impact
- Should it be compulsory to buy footwear and clothing?
- To save Australian clothing industry women must all wear same uniform
- Don't confuse plucking heart strings with plucking harp strings
- Speech only for public
- Catchy Tariff Circus Extravaganza
- Bert Kelly in 1985 on cars yet again
- Hurrah for the Gang of Five
- Thoughts on a verse about Balfour
- Bert Kelly pep talk to politicians
- Government intervention = Agony postponed but death brought nearer
- Recipe for disaster: Freeze!
- Recipe for government intervention: Gather winners and scatter losers
- Recipe for industry destruction: Blanket market signals
- Mavis writes!
- Bert Kelly's empiricism is not kneejerk reaction kind
- The $2,000 song of the shirt worker
- Subsiding only small farmers means subsiding the big banks
- Difficult to be fast on your feet when you've got your ear to the ground
- It would surprise people to see how sensible MPs behave if they think they are not being watched
- Bert Kelly on "this land of limitless resources" and "great open spaces"
- Growing bananas at the South Pole
- Car components tariff protection under fire
- Why carry a $300m car subsidy?
- Tariff feather beds for the foreign giants
- Bert Kelly says end compulsory voting to stop donkey vote
- Perhaps being smart and insured isn't all luck
- You gets your tariff, you pays a price
- More funds to train Olympians?
- Fire in their guts and wind in ours
- Should free universal healthcare include pets?
- Sound advice from a modest farmer
- A tottering monument to intervention
- Cunning meets wisdom
- Competition, Aussie-style: Who's the bigger parasite?
- Australians are proud patriotic parasites, says Bert Kelly
- Taxpayer-funded sport is cheating
- Being loved by all is not always a good thing
- Welfare State Destroys Society
- 1980 Bert Kelly feather bed series
- The White Mice Marketing Board
- Government intervention and advice can be harmful, even when right, even for those it tries to help
- One small step on the compulsory voting landmine
- The free & compulsory education sacred cows have no clothes
- Holding a loaded wallet to an economist's head
- Political No Man's Land
- Only blind greed demands both equality and prosperity
- A cow that sucks itself — that's us!