by Benjamin Marks, editor-in-chief

Those who claim they support small government have given me such excuses for not debating anarchism vs. minarchism as:

  1. Minarchism is already such an unpopular position that advocating anarchism would further marginalise their position.
  2. Only after minimal government is reached will debating anarchism be worthwhile.
  3. Infighting is a poor use of time, as there are more pressing and popular fallacies to correct.

Given the resounding failure of to engage with defenders of government about anarchocapitalist arguments — despite our credibility, our talent, our charm, our straightforward requests and challenges, our pioneering work making authors they ought to like available and our ridiculously prominent, provocative and amusing attempts to engage with political apologists on every page of the website — I thought it appropriate to write a defence of anarchocapitalism that ignores the truth-value of anarchist arguments and instead focusses on the pragmatic benefits of anarchism vis-à-vis minarchism. Here is a list of six pragmatic reasons why minarchists should advocate anarchism:

  1. It would reshape the political landscape, putting the middle-ground more towards minarchism — Given that wholesale change rarely occurs and a middle-ground is usually what eventuates, it would be wise strategy for minarchists to move the middle-ground of mainstream political debate over to their side more by advocating anarchism, which is the most extreme smaller-government position on the statist-anarchist spectrum.
  2. Anarchist language is stronger and more emotive than minarchist language — Calling tax theft and government criminal is more forceful than saying, “Government expenditure is wasteful, except in certain areas, provided there are strict controls, which make government restrain, police and adjudicate itself.”
  3. Anarchist arguments are easier to follow — Anarchist principles are easier to get one’s head around, as they don’t have exceptions allowing for the defence industry monopoly, the invalid contract of the constitution or the bias of a judge receiving tax money presiding over tax evasion cases.
  4. Anarchist arguments cannot be used as leverage for government expansion — Anarchist arguments don’t allow critics to say, “Since minarchists support government control of important areas, then why not for less important areas?” This pointing out of lack of principle also expands to practice, where the limitations minarchists espouse end up being used as leverage for government expansion rather than limitation (see here).
  5. Anarchist arguments are radical, emphasising principles — Although the softly-softly approach may help you get mainstream acceptance, being extremely radical and uncompromising can also help attract attention. It makes people think you’re more interested in truth than populism. And, because of its emphasis on principles rather than utilitarian considerations, it is more headline-grabbing, educational, memorable, passion-provoking and movement-building. Lang Hancock criticised the soft approach here.
  6. Unpopular now can be popular later; unpopular does not mean uninfluential — Being unpopular does not, of itself, mean that one is less influential. As Clarence Philbrook said, “Of course the man least demonstrably ineffectual is he who advises others to do what he knows they will do without his advice.” Similarly, Bob Howard said, “You can’t change public opinion by telling people what they already agree with.” So the unpopularity of anarchism is no argument against advocating it.

In conclusion, minarchists have no excuse not to justify their beliefs against anarchocapitalists arguments. The middle and right columns of makes engaging with anarchocapitalist arguments easy. If minarchists still refuse to engage with anarchocapitalist arguments, then this article should at least make them consider why they don’t advocate anarchism anyway, as espousing anarchism is a sensible strategy for achieving minarchism.

(in order of appearance on
  1. Acquiescence
  2. Why Sports Fans Should Be Libertarians
  3. Ron Manners’ Heroic Misadventures
  4. Government Schools Teach Fascism Perfectly
  5. Deport Government to Solve Immigration Problem
  6. The Drugs Problem Problem
  7. Self-Defeating Campaigning
  8. Gittinomics: Economics for Gits
  9. Exclusive Ross Gittins Interview on The Happy Economist
  10. Population Puzzle Solved
  11. An Open Letter to the CIS
  12. Principled Foreign Policy Options: Reinvade or Shut Up and Get Out
  13. WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Political Corruption Exposed!
  14. Feedback please: Is this worth doing?
  15. CIS and IPA Defend State Schooling
  16. A Thorough Review Without Spoilers of Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps
  17. Dead Reckoning and Government: A Proposal for Electoral Reform
  18. Quadrant Defends State Schooling
  19. The MPS 2010 Consensus
  20. Slogans for Property Rights Funeral
  21. Government is Impossible: Introduction
  22. Government is Criminal: Part 1
  23. Exclusive John Howard Interview on Lazarus Rising
  24. Response to Senator Cory Bernardi and the IPA
  25. Earn $$$$$ by Justifying Government Against Anarchocapitalism: Survey
  26. Statism is Secrecy: WikiLeaks vs
  27. One question the Labor Party, the Liberal Party, the Greens, the CIS, the IPA, Ross Gittins, Ross Garnaut, Ken Henry, Gerard Henderson, John Quiggin, Clive Hamilton, Tim Flannery, Catallaxy Files, Club Troppo, Larvatus Prodeo, Phillip Adams, Robert Manne, Michael Stutchbury, Miranda Devine, Andrew Bolt and Dick Smith are scared to answer
  28. Libertarian Philanthropists Should Exploit Tax Evasion Convictions
  29. Ronald Kitching Obituary
  30. The Minarchist Case for Anarchism
  31. Libertarianism in a 300-word rant
  32. in the news again
  33. Libertarianism In An Executive Summary
  34. The Banking Bubble Blow-by-Blow
  35. WARNING: Libertarianism Is NOT ...
  36. Would Anything Possibly Convince You that You Are Living Under a Protection Racket?
  37. An Open Letter to Dick Smith
  38. at 42
  39. "My boyfriend calls himself a Marxist and votes Labor, what should I do?"
  40. "He says if I leave him due to politics, I should leave the country too."
  41. No Booboisie at Gülçin’s Galt’s Gulch
  42. "Hey, Mr Anarchocapitalist, show me a society without government"
  43. The Three Epoch-Making Events of the Modern Libertarian Movement
  44. Government is Criminal: Part 2 - Methodological Individualism
  45. Government is Criminal: Part 3 - Subjective Utility
  46. Government is Criminal: Part 4 - Praxeological Synonyms
  47. Government is in a State of Anarchy
  48. Limited Government is Absolute Government
  49. Why the 2012 double Nobel laureate is coming to Sydney
  50. Exclusive Oliver Marc Hartwich Interview on Hans-Hermann Hoppe
  51. A Critique of the Opening Two Sentences of the "About CIS" Page on The Centre for Independent Studies' Website,
  52. An invitation for ANDEV members to the Mises Seminar
  53. Sell the ABC to Rupert Murdoch: Lid Blown on ABC Funding Disgrace!
  54., The Centre for Independent Studies new blog
  55. The Unconstitutionality of Government in Australia (demonstrated in under 300 words)
  56. The Best Libertarian Film Is ...
  57. Launch Southeast Asian Military Operations to Free Australian Drug Dealers and Consumers
  58. Workers Party Reunion Intro
  59. Hoppe's Inarticulate Australian Critics: The Hon Dr Peter Phelps, Dr Steven Kates and James Paterson
  60. Vice Magazine Westralian Secession Interview
  61. Sideshow to Dr Steven Kates' criticism of the Mises Seminar: Davidson vs Hoppe on Adam Smith
  62. The Best Australian Think Tank Is ...
  63. Announcing a new magazine to rival Time and The Economist
  64. The exciting new Australian Taxpayers' Alliance
  65. Neville Kennard Obituary
  66. Contrarian Conformism
  67. An invitation for Dick Smith, the IPA and other Walter Block fans to the 2nd Australian Mises Seminar
  68. Westralian mining legend Ron Manners of Mannkal belongs in The Property and Freedom Society
  69. What would Bert Kelly think of the Mises Seminar and Walter Block?
  70. Bad news about the Mises Seminar
  71. Gina Rinehart Fan Club gives big to Australian political education
  72. Sam Kennard wins North Sydney by-election by unanimous consent
Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.5
(in order of appearance on
  1. The Minarchist Case for Anarchism
  2. Minarchy vs Anarchy
  3. Why Classical Liberals Should Debate Anarchocapitalists
Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.5